Descripción
|
|
---|---|
Software reuse can be defined as the process of creating software products from the existing ones rather than developing software from scratch. Thus, software reuse is normally proposed to increase software productivity and quality and leads to economic benefits. In this sense, the reuse of software requirements has received important attention because it provides a solid support to develop quality software through obtaining and reusing quality software requirements [i.e., software product line (SPL) approach used in large-sized software enterprises]. However, the small-sized enterprises?which represent up to 85 % of all software organizations in many countries around the world?cannot implement a SPL approach because it does not fit with the context, properties, and complexity of their software projects. Moreover, the software engineering community has not adequately explored a more proper approach in the context of small-sized software enterprises. The use of a software requirements catalog could be this proper approach. In this context, the aim of this paper was to introduce the requirements reuse model for software requirements catalog (RRMSRC). Also, a set of guidelines to perform the main activities defined for reusing functional requirements within small-sized software enterprises is provided. As evidence of its feasibility, RRMSRC has been used in an industrial context, and the obtained results and learned lessons are summarized. | |
Internacional
|
Si |
JCR del ISI
|
Si |
Título de la revista
|
Journal of Requirements Engineering |
ISSN
|
0947-3602 |
Factor de impacto JCR
|
2,381 |
Información de impacto
|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Posición y Tercil: 51/146 T2, Q2; COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, Posición y Tercil: 24/106 T1, Q1 |
Volumen
|
22 |
DOI
|
10.1007/s00766-015-0243-1 |
Número de revista
|
2 |
Desde la página
|
275 |
Hasta la página
|
287 |
Mes
|
JUNIO |
Ranking
|
Citas recibidas: 1 (WOK), 3 (Scholar) lo que le sitúa entre el 0,10% (11 citas) y el 1% (3 citas) de los artículos más citados de su especialidad (Fuente de información: Field Baseline de los Essential Science Indicators ? Web of Science) |