Observatorio de I+D+i UPM

Memorias de investigación
Artículos en revistas:
Full environmental life cycle cost analysis of concentrating solar power technology: contribution of externalities to overall energy costs
Año:2016
Áreas de investigación
  • Protección del medio ambiente,
  • Generación solar térmica,
  • Economía ecológica,
  • Proyecto de inversión
Datos
Descripción
The aim of this work is to investigate the use of Full Environmental Life Cycle Costing (FeLCC) methodology to evaluate the economic performance of a 50 MW parabolic trough Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant operating in hybrid mode with different natural gas inputs (between 0 and 30 %). The analysis is based on a plant located in Southern Spain and includes existing financial incentives for the promotion of renewable energies. The analysis also incorporates an estimation of external costs associated with atmospheric emissions on six categories: Human Health, Loss of Biodiversity, Local and Global Damage to Crops, Damage to Materials and Climate Change. In a scenario where the project is funded through equity, the life cycle internal costs of the plant operating with solar energy only represent 82.8 ?/MWh, while revenues from electricity sales amount to 85.7 ?/MWh, resulting in a net present value of 2.95 ?/MWh. Internal costs are attributable primarily to the purchase of materials and equipment incurred mainly during the Extraction and Manufacturing life cycle phase. In this scenario, external costs (calculated using CASES damage costs methodology) represent less than 2.6 % of all the internal costs considered. Hybridizing CSP with natural gas allows higher overall power outputs due to extended operating hours. However, this strategy involves higher internal costs, resulting in a significant reduction in the revenues (per unit of power generated) and in the net present value of the project. Thus, the existing regulatory system in Spain makes CSP hybridization with natural gas economically unattractive. In addition, the use of natural gas in CSP installations results in a rapid increase in environmental damage as evidenced by higher external costs. For instance, external unit costs of CSP with 30 % natural gas were up to 8.6 times higher than in solar-only operation, due primarily to superior greenhouse gas emissions. When the analysis is extended to consider financing through bank loan under common market conditions, the same project shows economic viability for percentages of NG hybridization up to 14%. However, solar-only operation remains as the best option.
Internacional
Si
JCR del ISI
Si
Título de la revista
Solar Energy
ISSN
0038-092X
Factor de impacto JCR
3,541
Información de impacto
Datos JCR del año 2013
Volumen
135
DOI
Número de revista
Desde la página
758
Hasta la página
768
Mes
OCTUBRE
Ranking
Esta actividad pertenece a memorias de investigación
Participantes
  • Autor: Blanca Corona Bellostas (UPM)
  • Autor: Eduardo Cerrajero (IDie)
  • Autor: Diego López (IDie)
  • Autor: Guillermo San Miguel Alfaro (UPM)
Grupos de investigación, Departamentos, Centros e Institutos de I+D+i relacionados
  • Creador: Departamento: Ingeniería Química Industrial y del Medio Ambiente
S2i 2021 Observatorio de investigación @ UPM con la colaboración del Consejo Social UPM
Cofinanciación del MINECO en el marco del Programa INNCIDE 2011 (OTR-2011-0236)
Cofinanciación del MINECO en el marco del Programa INNPACTO (IPT-020000-2010-22)