|
Abstract
|
|
|---|---|
| This paper presents three hydrographical ontologies (which are built using top-down and bottom-up approaches) and an approach to comparing them; the goal of this approach is to prove which ontologies have a better coverage of the domain. In order to compare the resultant ontologies, six qualitative facets have been studied: sources used (amount, richness and consensus), reliability of building approaches (community extending use, recommendations), ontology richness (number and types of components), formalization (language), granularity (scale factor) and the design criteria followed. | |
|
International
|
Si |
|
Congress
|
Fourth International Workshop ¿Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems¿ (IF&GIS 09) |
|
|
960 |
|
Place
|
St. Petersburg, Russia. |
|
Reviewers
|
Si |
|
ISBN/ISSN
|
978-3-642-00303-5 |
|
|
|
|
Start Date
|
17/05/2009 |
|
End Date
|
20/05/2009 |
|
From page
|
193 |
|
To page
|
207 |
|
|
Fourth International Workshop Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems (IF&GIS 09)Popovich et al., (eds.) Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (LNG&C) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 |